contrary to his wishes” (desires) (p. 41, note 60). But in spite of this large area of agreement, there appear to be some important areas of difference between our views. My basic problem with Feinberg’s view is that, logically, it amounts to a denial of human free choice and, thus, would make God responsible for evil. The first problem I see with the position is that Feinberg holds that God can decide (choose) contrary to his desires but we cannot. If this is so, then God is free and we are not.